Controls at mint slot
Mint supply is not circulating or tradable supply.
DOSSIER FEDERATION INTELLIGENCE
An evidence-led look at a token's controls, supply and ownership patterns. Every answer should show its source. Every gap should say unknown.
Enter a Solana mint for a fresh, read-only structure snapshot. The September GFOF archive and movement case concern the former mint; use the current mint link below for today's token. No wallet connection, automatic sale verdict, bundle accusation, safety rating or trading recommendation.
Published GFOF evidence: Mint controls and three lock schedules · October 8, 2026. A dated record for the current mint, separate from a fresh Lens read.
Submitted mint address
Reading finalized Solana account data. A slow account source may leave only verified mint facts available.
Inspect this address in Solana Explorer ↗The largest-account source did not finish this read.
The link fills the mint address; the recipient chooses whether to run a fresh lookup. It does not preserve this result.
Mint supply is not circulating or tradable supply.
No top-20 accounts, controllers, distribution, sales or bundle finding is shown. Try a fresh lookup later. The mint facts can still be saved and compared below.
Open this token on Solscan ↗Choose its Holders tab for a separate view. Dossier has not checked or saved that site's data.
Balances came from ranking slot ; minted supply came from a different finalized slot. Each percentage is an approximate comparison with total minted supply, not circulating or tradable supply. Controllers and account roles were not read. These addresses are token accounts, not identified people. No combined concentration figure or movement finding is made.
Save this partial report. On a later visit, choose that file after checking the same mint again. An earlier full Lens report also works. Only mint-account facts are compared in your browser; the file is not uploaded.
Save this partial report for later comparison ↓An earlier capture at a lower mint slot is needed.
This does not authenticate saved files or establish when a control changed. Ranked balances, when present, are not compared here; movements remain unknown.
SOLANA MINT
Observed account and mint facts, not a safety rating or a count of people. Results can be cached for up to five minutes.
The link fills the mint address; the recipient chooses whether to run a fresh lookup. It does not preserve this result.
Other token accounts are not listed. The mint supply and ranked balances were read at separate finalized slots, so this page does not present a combined concentration percentage as one observation.
Individual account ratios below are approximate comparisons with total minted supply, not circulating supply, tradable float, or a count of people.
Mint supply, not circulating or tradable supply.
Beneficial owners, launch bundles, sales, locks, liquidity and safety need separate evidence. A large or moving token account is not an accusation.
“Controller” is the token account's recorded authority, not an identified person. A cited address match does not establish that the token account is a pool vault or show who benefits from its balance. Changed balances between reads are marked.
Save this report now. On a later visit, check the same mint and choose that saved JSON file here. The comparison runs in your browser; the file is not uploaded.
Save this report for later comparison ↓An earlier capture is needed to compare source slots.
This does not authenticate the saved file. An account outside a later top-20 sample has not necessarily sold or emptied its balance. This view compares recorded observations, not transactions.
Finalized Solana RPC methods: getAccountInfo, getTokenLargestAccounts and getMultipleAccounts. The report lists their slots. Source addresses open in Solana Explorer; independent re-ranking and history analysis are not performed.
FORMER SOLANA MINT · HISTORICAL CAPTURE
These are account and mint facts observed at recorded Solana slots. They are not a current-token report, safety rating or count of people.
The dated source returned 20 ranked token accounts; other accounts are not listed. Mint supply and account balances came from separate finalized slots. No combined concentration percentage is presented as one atomic reading.
One controller address matches Meteora's published DBC address ↗. The account role remains unclassified; this does not establish a pool vault or who benefits from its balance.
Units use six token decimals. Supply is not circulating supply.
No authority was present in the captured mint account.
No authority was present in the captured mint account.
Both Solana's public RPC and PublicNode matched the Ankr mint fields at nearby finalized slots. These facts do not prove market safety or who controls other accounts.
Beneficial owners, launch coordination, Jito bundles, lock terms, liquidity and tradable supply require separate evidence. A common slot or a large token account is not a bundle verdict.
Movement after this capture has not been analyzed. A separate historical movement case examines three earlier transactions. An outgoing transfer alone is not a sale.
Each approximate account share compares a ranked balance with mint supply from a separate finalized slot. It is not tradable float. “Controller” is the token account’s recorded authority, which may be a wallet or program; it does not identify a person.
Ankr returned the ranked token accounts. Solana's public RPC independently matched all 20 account balances and owners at a later finalized slot; it did not independently re-rank every account. The downloadable JSON contains the methods, parameters, source responses and limits.
THE QUESTION
Two token accounts sent GFOF to a third. That third account later swapped its full 15 million GFOF balance. The chain shows the route and asset received, not the people behind the accounts.
Different recorded controllers
Transfers received. No sale shown yet.
226.961368 USDC was an intermediate leg.
Unwrapped; native balance rose 2.588829226 SOL net.
Token account 2XHh…E6uK ↗ sent 10,000,000 GFOF to FYYi…B1WH ↗. This receipt shows a token transfer, without a payment back to the source account.
Check transaction · slot 421420932 ↗A different token account, 7Hnq…jfPPY ↗, sent another 5,000,000 GFOF to FYYi…B1WH. Its recorded controller differs from the first source account’s controller. The receipts do not establish that those controllers are the same person.
Check transaction · slot 421429492 ↗The FYYi…B1WH controller signed a successful route sending 15,000,000 GFOF into the Meteora DBC pool. The route produced 226.961368 USDC as an intermediate leg, then delivered 2.611147511 wrapped SOL to a temporary account controlled by the signer. That account was closed into native SOL.
Check swap and route · slot 421466364 ↗The final wrapped SOL went to an account controlled by signer AJyE…YZRo ↗ and was unwrapped in the same transaction. After referral payment and transaction costs, that signer’s native SOL balance rose by 2.588829226 SOL. The 226.961368 USDC was routed onward and must not be counted as additional final proceeds.
This case does not identify a beneficial owner, prove profit, establish a Jito bundle, or trace the SOL after this transaction. It does not classify every movement by these accounts or every GFOF sale. The current top-account rankings were captured months later and are not historical May rankings.
A bounded public Solana RPC capture saved the finalized, parsed transactions. We compared the transfers and route with Solana Explorer. This case labels the first two events transfers and the third an executed swap because the transaction links GFOF input to the intermediate USDC leg and final SOL receipt. It is a dated teaching example, not an automatic tracker.
ILLUSTRATIVE ASSET
One fictional mint. One place to separate what the chain says from what people guess.
Would indicate whether additional units can be minted at the captured slot.
Would indicate whether token accounts can be frozen under this program.
A missing authority is one fact, not a blanket safety verdict. Token-2022 extensions require their own review.
A same-slot buy or shared funder can point to coordination. Neither alone proves common control or a Jito execution bundle.
This panel would link the exact transactions and rule behind any future finding. No accusation from a pattern alone.
A real report would expose its RPC methods, raw account links, captured slot, source timestamp, classification rule and unresolved gaps. Readers should be able to challenge a finding.