Historical mint notice: this September record concerns former mint 2oQmHWoTZRmRLregHKjBSGJy3ueX3iRNzimy2iZCmoon. The current GFOF mint is Dc9CeuctqvP947ipnCJb8fSf6HhNWDooAQxsVHj2RNBV. The source files and original measurements below remain dated evidence of the former mint.
What changed between two captures?
Two finalized reads of the same Solana mint show a lower balance in one documented Meteora DBC pool-authority token account. The other 19 sampled account balances and all 20 recorded controllers matched. This is a comparison of observations, not a transaction trail.
These captures do not show the intervening transactions, destination, consideration, beneficial owner or exact proceeds. A pool-authority account is not one person's wallet. No trading or safety verdict is made. This is GFOF's own mint, chosen as a documented example rather than a representative token sample.
TWO SOURCE FILES
Check the observations
01 / BEFORE
Mint slot 451154321 · ranking/detail slot 451154322. Ankr ranked the accounts; a later public RPC read cross-checked their balances and owners at slot 451154709. That check did not independently re-rank every token account.
SHA-256 of linked filec3e14c4dbc4e7370fecbeb56d79d499a644ca2798b525ce08a30e36cea224a36
02 / AFTER
Mint/ranking slot 451652756 · detail slot 451652758. A live Lens report used getAccountInfo, getTokenLargestAccounts and getMultipleAccounts. The ranking was not independently re-run against another provider.
SHA-256 of linked file86a2cac0ac54a4585051c3b7de65bef6d2cac87091d07e4928413ce15eddea04
INTERPRETATION
What remained the same?
All 20 token-account addresses appeared in both ranked samples; their recorded controllers matched.
Nineteen sampled detail balances matched. The documented pool-authority account was the sole balance difference in this sample.
Recorded mint supply, mint authority and freeze authority matched at the two mint slots. This does not prove they stayed unchanged at every intervening slot.
The top-20 share fell from 86.3283% to 86.2753% of recorded mint supply, a 0.0530 percentage-point difference. This is account concentration, not concentration of people or tradable supply.
The original dated archive and later live Lens report have different JSON layouts. The comparison matches the mint, token-account addresses, controllers and detail-slot raw amounts; it does not infer transfers from rank or balance differences. The SHA-256 digests identify the exact linked file bytes for later comparison; a digest alone does not authenticate a chain claim.
· Revision 1: initial two-capture comparison. If the interpretation changes, append a dated correction here and retain the original source files or explicitly identify their replacements.